Everyone knows that babies can arrive in one of two ways: vaginally or by C-section. But does that mean it’s a good idea to schedule a C-section so you can meet your baby once you are full-term? Or is it better to let nature take its course?

In almost every scenario, delivering a baby vaginally is what is best for both mom and baby. Moms who give birth vaginally lose less blood at the time of delivery, leave the hospital earlier, and recover more quickly than moms who deliver by surgery. They also initiate breastfeeding more frequently and have lower rates of postpartum infections.

We also know that babies born vaginally are exposed to the beneficial hormones associated with labor and even benefit from picking up the good vaginal bacteria from their moms as they pass through the birth canal. They also tend to have less respiratory issues since the process of going through the birth canal helps to push more amniotic fluid out of their lungs.

However, sometimes some women need to deliver by C-section even before labor starts. Medical reasons for this include having a placenta previa or certain health conditions for the mom that make labor too dangerous for her to experience, to name just a few.

But what about the other women, for whom a vaginal birth is perfectly fine? Is it still OK if they want to skip labor and head straight for the operating room? Some women think so: they like the idea of picking the date their baby is born so they can have a certain birthday or coordinate with family plans, for example. Other women would prefer to avoid vaginal tearing or think that labor will hurt too much. For these moms, should their doctor or midwife heed their request and schedule a C-section?

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists believes the answer is a resounding no. There is even a name for this category of C-sections: cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR), aka a C-section without any medical reasons for needing one.

It is not known for sure, but it is thought that about 2.5 percent of all primary (or first) C-sections for women in this country are because they fall in the category of CDMR. This rate may be much higher, however, since it can be hard to get this data from reviewing charts.

While C-sections may be life-saving for some moms and babies, they do not come without their own risks. It is precisely because of these risks that this major abdominal surgery — which is what a C-section is — should only be used when necessary.

We know that women who deliver by C-section stay longer in the hospital and are at higher risk for postpartum infection and blood clots. The next pregnancy also becomes more high-risk, because complications such as placenta accreta, placenta previa, uterine rupture, and damage of internal organs at the time of a future C-section are more common in women who’ve had one prior C-section.

Given all this information, if a woman asks her doctor or midwife to schedule a C-section without a medical reason, her provider should try to find out why she is making this request. If it is because of fear of labor or pain or wanting to plan her little one’s arrival, a little education can go a long way in showing why this isn’t the ideal solution. Most women, when given the right information and the time to voice their concerns and have their issues addressed, will come to see why being patient and attempting a vaginal delivery should often be the goal.


  • In most cases, a vaginal birth is preferred over delivering by C-section.
  • A cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) is a C-section without any medical reasons for needing one.
  • CDMR should be avoided in most cases.

Last reviewed by Diana Huang, MD, FACOG. Review Date: May 2020


  1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion #559: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. April 2013.


  1. I feel this article makes womens resoning for C-section by maternal request sound flippant and shallow. There are many other reasons for choosing a C-section other than the two listed and those reasons should be addressed and respected, such as sexual assualt survivors. This article makes women sound like they are shallow in their decisions and it reflects a male biased picture of women’s reasoning. Also you only cite one source, it would be nice to bring up articles and studies with findings inconsistent with your one source, because they do exist and they should be given consideration. This article sounds much like pushing one opinion, even a medical opinion, as fact and that is just not the case.

    1. You are absolutely right – an assault history can definitely be a reason why a woman might request a primary C-section. Luckily, for many women with appropriate counseling and therapy and good planning, they can be successful at avoiding a major surgery with increased risks for future pregnancies. I definitely don’t have a male bias towards women’s reasoning as I am a woman myself, but I do see the risks and poor outcomes that can come with unnecessary C-sections and risks to subsequent pregnancies. The best outcomes are early, frequent, and respectful, two-way dialogue when it comes to this topic, I think.


Tell us who you are! We use your name to make your comments, emails, and notifications more personal.

Tell us who you are! We use your name to make your comments, emails, and notifications more personal.